Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

Illinois Democrats Move To Tighten Firearm Regulation/Restrictions...

One of America's Greatest Pastimes, Early Polling...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

As the Melodrama Continues...

Ignoring the Likely Realities...

The ObamaCare Divide Creating Two America's...

Epstein files |All big & famous new names 😲...

As The Feds Ship Illegals To Massachusetts From The Southern Border...

Every So Often the Nation Gets GREAT News!...

On a Different Note and Looking Ahead...