Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

The ObamaCare Divide Creating Two America's...

Every So Often the Nation Gets GREAT News!...

Herr Drumpf Shocks The World, and, Real Americans...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

The Losing of Iraq...

Tonight's VP Debate, Mike Pence With the Unenviable Position of Defending The Donald's Madness...

Women Overwhelmingly Support Clinton Over Trump...

Spoken Like a True Dyed In the Blue Statist...

Race Baiting at the Highest Level of the Federal Government...?

On Raising the Debt Ceiling...