Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

As the Obama Administration and a Compliant Lame Stream Media Continue the Benghazi Spin...

It's Going To Be Close, Brace Yourself For Continued Polarization of America, Especially if Obama Loses...

Another Republican Accused Of Sexual Misconduct...

Illinois Democrats Move To Tighten Firearm Regulation/Restrictions...

Our Biggest Creditor {China} Tells Us "The good old days of borrowing are over"

How A Nation Can and Does Change...

And The Carnage Continues...

Democrats Bought By Special Interest Money, and They Say It's All Republicans...