Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

Herr Drumpf Shocks The World, and, Real Americans...

Karl Rove on His 2013 Predictions and More...

David Adler: The Freedom Flotilla, Peter Thiel & the New Colonial Order...

Remembering Robert Thurman (1941-2026)...

Guru Arjan Dev Ji embodied peace, acceptance & connection with the Divine in the face of suffering...

Senator Paul Questions the President's Moral Authority to Lead...

10 Most Darkest & Controversial US Presidents In History | Bedtime History Documentary...

How Bad Could It Be? | A Darkly Satirical Protest Song About Trump, MAGA & American Authoritarianism...

Zionist Israel Must Be Held To Account for It"s Genocide of Palestinians!...

Even Some Left Leaning Publications (or at least their opinion columnists) Get it Right Occasionally...