Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

The 4 SCHOOLS of TIBETAN BUDDHISM Explained | Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya & Gelug...

How A Nation Can and Does Change...

Are We Americans Capable of Entering Into Rational, Honest, and Productive Discusion Over Sensitive Matters?...

Compromise On Unemployment Extension Refused By Dem's

Compassion Without a “Compassionate One...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

We Need To Take Back Control Of Our Economy...

Classic Blowhard, the "Donald" Trump...

And So It Goes In America Today

MAGA IMPLODES AS ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE...