Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

THE PROTOCOLS & THE SCOFIELD BIBLE...

Are Republicans and the Trump Administration Taking on Water?...

THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION & THE SCOFIELD BIBLE – A Dive into Arab Interpretation Master...

Is President Obama Really a War Hawk?...

Are We Americans Capable of Entering Into Rational, Honest, and Productive Discusion Over Sensitive Matters?...

3 Buddhist Teachings to Instantly Quiet Your Mind & Stop Overthinking...

May PEOTUS Trump Reap That Which He Has Sowed...

Over the Top, Even for Obama...

His True Colors...