Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

Humanity's Voice‼️🎖...

Economist’s WARNING - The End of Capitalism Is Here!...

And The Carnage Continues...

How A Nation Can and Does Change...

Rep. Louie and the Fear Propagators ...

Open Thread On the SOTU Address, So Lets Mix It Up!...

The "Scandal" That Won't Go Away...

If we met God, Allah or Jesus then they will say this || shocking answer from Dalai Lama