Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

"Remember all those times Trump & Vance said they wouldn’t drag America into another war? They LIED."...

"US & Israel Are LYING About Nuclear Weapons To Jus0tify War On Iran"...

"While USA Revives Colonialism, China Promotes Multipolarity & Peace"...

"Jeffery Sachs' Brutally Explosive Analysis Of The Middle East War, America & Why 'Asia Will Lose'" ...

Herr Drumpf Shocks The World, and, Real Americans...

"Jeffrey Sachs: “US Will Fail” in Iran War | Israel a Terror State? | Russia & China’s Next Move"...

Will Trump's Economic Policies Make America Great "Again"...

Professor Jiang Predicts: US WILL LOSE Iran War...

When You Finally Let GO, Everything Falls Into Place...

NEW HIT SINGLE - Supremacist Heartland Blues...