Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

West Asia War Explodes: Jeffrey Sachs Decodes India’s Role & UAE’s Shock OPEC Exit...

And The Carnage Continues...

NYPD Oficer Shot in the Face, Were's the Outrage?...

The State of the Economy and ObamaCare...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

The Syria Solution: Obama Got Played by Putin and Assad, Or Did He?...

10 Teachings of the Dalai Lama...

As The Feds Ship Illegals To Massachusetts From The Southern Border...

OSHO: What Is the Meaning of Life?...