Free Speech Protected By Courts Decision In Citizens United Case

Rational Nation USA came out in support of the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United. The argument by the liberal establishment was it would in effect increase the influence of corporations and other "fat cat" interests if you will. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. Restrictions on direct contributions remain in effect.

The most important consideration in reversing campaign laws was the protection of free speech for all. Particularly political speech, and specifically any and all dissenting viewpoints. If the government has the power to curb political speech it finds undesirable it becomes open season on liberty and we all become losers.

The Cato Institute puts forth a compelling and objective argument for restricting the governments power to control or prevent free speech and expression of thought, and why the Supreme Courts reversal was appropriate.


Comments

  1. you know, i never could understand the reasoning behind any restrictions for contributions to candidates. if a candidate gets a $1000 what difference does it make whether that was a single donation or the 10 donations of $100 or a 100 donations of $10?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

RN USA no longer accepts comments. The information presented is for reflection, contemplation, and for those seeking greater understanding and wisdom. It is for seekers and those with an open mind and heart.

Namaste



Top Posts

West Asia War Explodes: Jeffrey Sachs Decodes India’s Role & UAE’s Shock OPEC Exit...

And The Carnage Continues...

NYPD Oficer Shot in the Face, Were's the Outrage?...

The State of the Economy and ObamaCare...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

The Syria Solution: Obama Got Played by Putin and Assad, Or Did He?...

10 Teachings of the Dalai Lama...

As The Feds Ship Illegals To Massachusetts From The Southern Border...

A political tsunami is coming for MAGA...