by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty
-vs- Tyranny


Adam Smith -vs- Ayn Rand. Capitalism was their common goal, the justification for achieving the ends of capitalism was their difference.



Based on pure logic and objectiveness Smith would have to concede to Rand.

Looking beyond the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, and post Soviet/Chinese/Southeast Asian communism, the debate is once again forefront and center.

Given the changing realities of modern western society how would you characterize capitalism today and what specifically would you suggest we ought modify or do differently?

For a insightful yet brief analysis of Smith and how his views might relate to the present please see taospeaks as you consider the foregoing.

There remains one thing abundantly clear. We as humans have yet to agree on the ultimate right solution. This is as it should be. Knowledge, growth, and ultimately achievement is NOT made by everyone always agreeing. Wouldn't you agree?

Cross posted at Left Coast Rebel

Comments

  1. Thank you for the mention.

    I think you might find this a better source for how Ayn Rand and Adam Smith differ.

    http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/03/where-ayn-rand-went-wrong-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

RN USA no longer accepts comments. The information presented is for reflection, contemplation, and for those seeking greater understanding and wisdom. It is for seekers and those with an open mind and heart.

Namaste



Top Posts

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

Drain the Swamp and Dump Its Lerader In 2020...

How A Nation Can and Does Change...

Law Enforcement vs. Health Care

Herr Drumpf Shocks The World, and, Real Americans...

The Final Farewell......

Temporarily...

Target To No Longer Offer Health Coverage To Part Time Employees...

Keystone XL Pipeline's First Spill, 210,000 Gallons...

The Public's Trust In Government on the Decline...