Illinois Democrats Move To Tighten Firearm Regulation/Restrictions...
by: Les Carpenter Rational Nation USA Liberty -vs- Tyranny As the country struggles to understand, and come to grips with random acts of firearm violence by unstable and unbalanced individuals Illinois is already taking action to further regulate firearms. Like the millions of law abiding citizens I am torn between the right to bear firearms and finding the point at which it makes logical sense to restrict that right. In a modern society in which the tools of warfare are advanced beyond what the founders could possibly have envisioned, and the efficiency of modern armies are such that the citizens would stand no reasonable chance against the modern army, does the possession of semiautomatic assault weapons have any real purpose for the homeowner and sportsman? If deemed they do should they not be highly regulated and restricted to HELP reduce the incidents of tragedies like Sandy Hook? I certainly do not have the answers, nor do I believe the anti-gun crowd has the answers eith...

Which means? President Hillary Clinton?
ReplyDeleteIt remains to be seen. But the odds in her favor increased marginally at the very least. And, party competition has been reduced by 50%. Better hope Bernie doesn't run independent in the general.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that the only apparent threat to Hillary is an independent run from the left, combined with the popularity of Trump among GOP voters, should show the GOP that the entire country has indeed shifted to the left and it is time for them now to start moving back to the center, a least a little. The Right Wing has collapsed.
ReplyDeleteJMJ
An independant run from the Left? Wouldn' that guarantee a Republican win... and cause the GOP to conclude that the entire country has shifted to the Right? Due to the "failure" of the Obama presidency?
ReplyDelete