Security Lax In Benghazi as Foreign Fighters Flow Into Libya From Egypt and On To Benghazi...
by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny
If we are going to have American Ambassadors and staff in known unfriendly and dangerous area's of the globe wouldn't it seem prudent to significantly elevate the level of security? Apparently such isn't the case with the Obama State Department.
It will be very interesting watching how the investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif will proceed. Given the State Department and Obama White House spin...
it is most certain Obama and his State Department will accept no responsibility.
Via: Memeorandum
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny
STR/AFP/GettyImages |
ABC News - ABC News has learned that Eric Nordstrom, the former Regional Security Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Libya, has told congressional investigators that security at the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, was “inappropriately low” – and believed that State Department officials stood in the way of his attempts to change that.
Nordstrom and the commander of a 16-member Security Support Team, Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Wood, heard that foreign fighters were flowing across the Egyptian border and were making their way across the border to the Libyan city of Derna – which is to the east of Benghazi — and from there were making their way to Benghazi. But State Department officials seemed oblivious to their Benghazi post’s vulnerability.
Nordstrom was worried -he did not know how much the Americans could rely on members of a local Libyan militia in Benghazi that provided security — the “17th of February Martyrs Brigade.” Mostly merchants and shopkeepers before the war, they seemed eager, but they hadn’t much experience and other than a daily $30 stipend for food from the U.S. Embassy, they hadn’t been paid in months.
Nordstrom had “no idea if they would respond to an attack,” he told investigators.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., will hold hearings on what went wrong today at noon ET. Nordstrom will testify at that hearing.
Nordstrom twice wrote to the State Department – in March and July 2012 — to beef up the presence of American security officers in Benghazi, but neither time was there a response. At no point from December 2011 through July 2012, when he left Libya, were more than three Diplomatic Security Service agents permanently and simultaneously stationed at the Benghazi post. {Read More}
If we are going to have American Ambassadors and staff in known unfriendly and dangerous area's of the globe wouldn't it seem prudent to significantly elevate the level of security? Apparently such isn't the case with the Obama State Department.
It will be very interesting watching how the investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif will proceed. Given the State Department and Obama White House spin...
Rice and White House officials now say those initial accounts were based on early intelligence, since corrected. State Department officials now call the attack unprecedented given the number of gunman, weapons and lethal force used.
it is most certain Obama and his State Department will accept no responsibility.
Via: Memeorandum
Obama is looking more inept by the day. It's so bad that even the press can't ignore it.
ReplyDeleteAmbassador Rice and Secretary Carney both need to put their hands and the Bible and start talking anew. And this time no executive privilege, please.
ReplyDeleteI watched that hearing earlier today (well, yesterday now). Issa came hard off the start asserting the hearing would NOT be based on any evidential facts, but rather commentaries by the Monday Morning Quarterback crowd on the Hill.
ReplyDeleteAnd sure enough, the partisan c-soan comedy serial was on.
Just the same, the administration did make serious mistakes, and people died. These sorts of things have happened under almost every administration in US history.
They needed to admit it, and they did. So what are you complaining about.
In libertarian terms: Why were we there in the first place? We were not a major player in their civil war (we just made it less bloody - kudos to Obama!), as far as our own US voters are concerned. We're not facing any level of direct threat from them now higher than what we were facing before.
This would be a cheap shot at Obama if it weren't true. After actually watching and listening to the hearings, I came away with a belief that the state department in Washington employed simplistic algorithms to deal with very serious matters. That bothers me. The prior administration was notorious for that kind of simple "logical" rationales, and you "conservatives" and "libertarians" and "Objectivists" didn't want to address it.
Did you watch the hearings? If you didn't, you can probably get it from C-Span.
And always remember, we've been hit just as hard without a massive military. We don't need a tril-a-year to defend ourselves. We're all armed after all, right?
JMJ
I watched the hearings, and the Obama people admitted and contritted (new word?) the embassy was in trouble.
ReplyDeleteI sincerely hope the Obama administration will make those involved pay dearly for what they did.
HEY! Libyan Extremist! We really don't want to tread on you. We have plenty of extremists in our country!
But if you invite us, and then kill us, you'll face hellfire. And we don't need a TRILLION A YEAR TO PAY FOR THAT.
Do we all agree on that?
JMJ
Spin? Is it spin that Issa refused to share documents with the Democrats on the Committee? Breaking House rules! Just a sign that it will not be a fair, open investigation.
ReplyDeleteJason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things'
ReplyDelete