Some Interesting Facts on the Plame Caper

1) Robert Novak was never approached by the Bush administration.............2) Valerie Plame drove to work/Langley in public view every day.............3) Henry Waxman allowed only one rebuttal witness at the hearings; Victoria Toensing, who he constantly harangued and threatened.............4) Plame was not covert as defined by the Intelligence Identities Act of 1982 (this, in that she hadn't been stationed overseas during the previous 5 years).............5) All that Robert Novak reported was that the wife of former Ambassador, Joe Wilson, is/was "an agency operative on weapons of mass destruction". Nothing was ever reported by Mr. Novak that Joe Wilson's wife was ever covert.............6) A media brief (comprised of some 36 media outlets) clearly states that "NO CRIME HAD BEEN COMMITTED" (in this supposed outing of Valerie Plame).............7) The first indication that Valerie Plame had ever been a covert operative came from a column by liberal ramrod, David Corn (2 days full after the Novak column).............8) In this column, Mr. Corn hypothesizes that Plame had been outed to punish Joe Wilson, something that Mr. Novak had NEVER suggested....9) Mr. Corn's source? It had to have been Joe Wilson. I mean, he doesn't mention anybody else in the piece, does he? And being that Robert Novak never mentioned it.............10) The original leaker of Plame-Wilson's name was Richard Armitage, in the words of Mr. Novak himself, "not a partisan gunslinger" (not to mention, an opponent of the Iraq War).............11) In the aforementioned media brief, it was alleged that Mrs. Plame-Wilson's cover was actually blown (in the mid-90s) by the C.I.A., first in Russia, and then through a C.I.A. disclosure to Fidel Castro.............12) According to Novak, he only learned the name, Valerie Plame, by reading Mr. Wilson's entry in "Who's Who in America".............13) Only two Republicans bothered to show up for the hearings. This, according to former Connecticut Congressman Christopher Shays (not exactly a partisan gunslinger, either), was predominantly because of Henry Waxman's "extreme bias".............14) Mr. Novak also points to sworn F.B.I. testimony which states that Mrs. Plame-Wilson's C.I.A. employment was common knowledge in Washington.............15) Novak never denigrated Wilson in the initial column. In fact, he spoke quite highly of him (referring to Mr. Wilson's "heroism" during the first Iraq War).............16) Novak opposed BOTH Iraq Wars and was never a fan of either Bush.............17) Conservative columnist, Cliff May (who I almost always disagree with when it comes to issues of foreign policy), lays it all out pretty well, I think; Either the Bush administration intentionally exposed a covert CIA agent as a way to take revenge against her husband who had written a critical op-ed OR this same Bush administration was attempting to set the record straight by telling reporters that it was NOT Vice President Cheney who had sent Wilson on the Africa assignment, as Mr. Wilson himself had claimed, but rather it was Wilson’s wife, a CIA employee, who had helped get him the assignment (and that that in fact is the conclusion of the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee). You make the call, I guess.............18) Yeah, I know, I'm a little late to the party on this one.

Comments

  1. Les, I am appalled. You regurgitated all the Bush apologists talking points about the Plame scandal. Is it ever okay to disclose agents who were even ever covert, at least if they or people they worked with are still alive? Do you address this central point in your post?

    No and no.

    Here's all a concerned citizen really needs to know about that militaristic plot:

    The Bush administration was pushing for war with Iraq.

    Joe Wilson came to the conclusion that a certain argument for war with Iraq was unfounded.

    The Bush administration outed Plame, Wilson's wife, a CIA agent in order to discredit Plame and Wilson as nepotistic and anti-Bush biased, respectively.

    In the end, regardless of any other facts, this was an act of treason by the Bush administration for the sake of promoting war.

    I am astonished that an Objectivist and pretty Constructionist American like you, Les, would be so parsimonious with this. I just don't know what else to say. You sound EXACTLY like a Neo-Con!

    Why???

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  2. jmj - Once again you show your... forget it dude.

    1) I did not write this piece.
    2) It is old history.
    3) I however do allow my contributors to choose the subject of their poss and put forth their opinions. All present and past understand my requirements.

    Now read carefully who the contributor is jmj, it is to be found if you read. You, given all your superior intelligence should realize I head my posts:

    by: Les Carpenter
    Rational Nation USA
    Liberty -vs- Tyranny

    I used to use the Birthplace of Independent Conservative. However, I grew to find it too long. as well as tiresome.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "POSTED BY WILL "TAKE NO PRISONERS" HART AT 12:05 AM"

    Oh! Okay! There, I saw it.

    It's a stupid piece. Stupid.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  4. jmj - Each is entitled to their opinion. However, the continuing use of words such as stupid in respect to individuals you disagree with only shows YOUR ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dude, I gave 16 unimpeachable facts, not talking points. And, just for the record, I never once voted for Bush and I opposed the Iraq War FROM DAY ONE. The only partisan drooler here is you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And the behavior of the mainstream media here was absolutely disgusting. In order to get Miller and Cooper out of jail, they filed a brief which stated that NO CRIME HAD BEEN COMMITTED in the Plame affair, that Plame had already been outed and that Plame wasn't at all covered at that time by the IIA. But then, afterwards, clowns like Chris Matthews drone on and on that a crime HAD been committed. You really want to put somebody in jail, dude? Try David Corn, Valerie Plame (on grounds of perjury) and Joe Wilson. They're the frigging stooges on THIS particular issue (Bush, etc., the stooges on others).

    ReplyDelete
  7. Will - Perhaps jmj will eventually arrive at he obvious. Well, then again... Not holding my breath!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wanted to ask him what he thought about that glamor shot; Wilson and his misses on the cover of Vogue. Oh, yeah, they were really hurt by this. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  9. JMJ: It's all rather fair. Not 'talking points' or apology. Will is a centrist who is rather anti-Bush. And it is clear to him also that the Democrats' claims about the Plame affair are kind of whacky.

    "The Bush administration was pushing for war with Iraq."

    You are re-writing history. The Bush administration urged Saddam Hussein to comply with the cease fire agreements. Saddam refused. War (retaliating, really... as war was already on) was a last resort.

    -----------

    Rational: Yeah. everyone is entitled to their opinion. But we are entitled to point out when it is flat out incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  10. such a ballsy statement flat line ---------

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

RN USA is a No Judgement Zone (to steal from Planet Fitness), so please, No Judgement of others. We reserve the right to delete any such comment immediately upon detection.

All views are welcome. As long as the comment is on topic and respectful of others.



Top Posts

The Ignorance and Arrogance of Obama...

Spoken Like a True Dyed In the Blue Statist...

The "Scandal" That Won't Go Away...

It's Going To Be Close, Brace Yourself For Continued Polarization of America, Especially if Obama Loses...

2015 Could Be a Bad Year for Liberals...

Small Businesses Can Improve the Health of a Community...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

April Job Numbers Appear Improved... Are They Really?

Jon Stewart and the Babbling Nancy Pelosi...