Thursday, November 1, 2012

A Definition Of Intolerance... From the Left

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty
-vs- Tyranny


Exposing the intolerance of the gay left. H/T GayPatriot

Our reader Tim in MT shared this video with us that he had made after catching Michelangelo Signorile on SiriusXM radio yesterday.

The left-wing radio talker, twice in the segment (at about 2:15 & 3:45) advises his gay Romney-supporting caller to drink arsenic or other poison so he can commit suicide. At 2:57, he tells the young man that he should not be allowed to vote.



Such tolerance.

To which I can only echo... Indeed, such tolerance.

Exposing the hypocrisy of the left.

Via: Memeorandum

17 comments:

  1. Can you imagine the howl if some conservative said that to some Obama-supporting drag queen?

    ReplyDelete
  2. One guy says something idiotic, and it's the hypocrisy of the entire left?

    Okay, then Akin and Mourdock and their moronic blatherings about rape and abortion expose the right for what they truly are.

    And those two jerks hope to win elective office. Signorile is nothing but a blogger and talker.

    Rush Limbaugh is more representative of the right than Signorile is of the left. No one really knows who Signorile is. Everyone knows Limbaugh is the titular head of the GOP, and all the pols soil their tightie whities when they get on the wrong side of an issue with him.

    He just bashed the GOP's hero, Chris Christie for working with President Obama. A mortal sin!

    Remember Chrisie? He's the guy that foul-mouthed woman, Coulter said the GOP should have nominated, and if they didn't they'd get Romney and they'd lose.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just employing the tactics of the left you yourself have used Shaw.

      Hows it feel when called out on it? Huh?

      Delete
    2. Shaw said: "Everyone knows Limbaugh is the titular head of the GOP"

      Lets do a fact check:

      Head of RNC: Chairman Reince Priebus.

      Party nominee, which, if he wins in a few days, will make him the top Republican: Mitt Romney.

      You are blowing smoke, Shaw.

      Now let's look at the meaning of the word "titular"

      "Holding or constituting a purely formal position or title without any real authority: "the queen is titular head of the Church of England"."

      Wow. Talk about someone using words entirely without any meaning at all. The Republican party, like the Democrats, has no such formal positions as queen, pope, etc. A sitting President and the head of the (R/D)NC come as close as one can to that.

      Delete
  3. RN, that's a really, really scuzzy excuse.

    ReplyDelete
  4. RN, there is no "truth" in what you wrote. You indicted all liberals for the demented blatherings of one jerk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no truth in what a lot of people write, agreed?

      But this dude said what he said in the air. Where is the outrage among the liberal crowd? Other than the Gay Patriot they ain't been much. Silence sometimes speaks volumes Shaw.

      I assume you see the issue and my point?

      Delete
    2. Rational: I've seen the same completely invalid and unintellectual point made again and again by liberals. Whenever someone points out something about this, they refuse to answer and then change the subject and then bring up something about Rush Limbaugh.

      Delete
  5. I didn't know about it until I saw it on Andrew Sullivan's blog--Sullivan, as you know, is gay and supports Pres. Obama--and Sullivan thoroughly reamed Signorile for his stupidity.

    I did not choose to write a blog post about it, since I don't know anyone who even knows who Signorile is. He doesn't have the millions and millions of listeners that Rush Limbaugh has, and I don't see conservative blogs giving Limbaugh a thrashing for every disgusting bigoted word he utters.

    There is no equivalency here, nor hypocrisy on the left.

    Sullivan, who gets several thousand hits a day on his blog to my dozen or so, is better positioned to condemn Signorile's outburst.

    Signorile was a jerk for saying what he said.

    But I have other thoughts on this issue, but I'll save them for another time.


    ReplyDelete
  6. "Signorile was a jerk for saying what he said."

    Yes indeed he was.


    "But I have other thoughts on this issue, but I'll save them for another time."

    Why wait? Have to check in with the liberal "bigots" first? I mean really, what are YOUR thoughts on the issue other than the obvious?

    ReplyDelete

  7. RN: "Why wait? Have to check in with the liberal 'bigots' first? I mean really, what are YOUR thoughts on the issue other than the obvious?"

    That's just plain nasty, Les, and unworthy of you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry for the "nastiness" of my response.

      Perhaps you felt a tinge of what I felt every time one of your bigoted visitors (and you know to whom I refer)unjustly attacked my character, almost a daily basis. You said nothing.

      Or, perhaps you miss the point entirely, really it doesn't matter in the big picture. Because being comfortable on ones own skin, and honestly knowing who you are and what you stand for is, in the final analysis, ALL that really matters.

      Have a good weekend Shaw...

      Delete
  8. "Perhaps you felt a tinge of what I felt every time one of your bigoted visitors (and you know to whom I refer)unjustly attacked my character, almost a daily basis. You said nothing."

    Um, you confuse me with my commenters. I have never attacked you personally. And you notice there is no more of that at my blog. Over the last month or so, I gave the "keys" to my blog to a trusted person while I was dealing with some personal family issues. Sometimes those comments got through.


    As to your character being attacked on my blog: dmarks did that very thing to me--calling me a racist on your blog, and you said nothing. I challenged dmarks to produce the evidence for that slur, he didn't. Because he's a liar.

    I've also been attacked on SF's blog as well, by the various scurrilous commenters who show up there from time to time and feel the need to slander me. SF can't fight my battles for me, so I deal with them the best way I can.

    I can't control all my commenters, except to delete everyone who says anything that offends. I then become nothing more than a censor. You're a big strong guy capable of defending your ideas. I don't think you need me to do so.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did not say you made the comments, now did I?

      However, you, or your trusted surrogate, allowed them to stand unchallenged. Equaling silent approval.

      I on the other hand have commented on your integrity both here and at PE.

      I realize you cannot control all the comments, nor would I or any reasonable person expect you to. It is the character of those particular character assassins that are disgusting and bigoted. There is a level at which decent individuals do not cross. Your bigoted commenter(s) crossed that line. But what is done is done, no big deal and no real harm done. I addressed the issue myself and it has been put to bed. I do enjoy exposing the hypocrisy of the fringe progressives anyway. Which, by the way, I do not consider you to be a "fringe progressive." You're rather main stream.

      Now, having responded, I will add that I DO NOT consider you a racist or a bigot. As I have said before, and I will say it again, you run a respectable blog that has many respectable visitors and as such your site provides a valuable service with its viewpoints that worth considering. Even if one disagrees. Calling you a racist Shaw was wrong, and dmarks choose his words poorly. I will let dmarks respond further if he chooses.

      Have a good weekend Shaw, I now have to study...

      Delete
  9. @ Shaw: One guy says something idiotic, and it's the hypocrisy of the entire left?

    Shaw the broad brush makes an entire blogging career off of such things.

    ReplyDelete

As this site encourages free speech and expression any and all honest political commentary is acceptable. Comments with cursing or vulgar language will not be posted.

Effective 8/12/13 Anonymous commenting has been disabled. This unfortunate action was made necessary due to the volume of Anonymous comments that are either off topic or serve only to disrupt honest discourse..

I apologizes for any inconvenience this necessary action may cause the honest Anonymous who would comment here, respect proper decorum and leave comments of value. However, The multitude of trollish attack comments from both the left and right has necessitated this action.

Thank you for your understanding... The management.