Ron Paul on Succession

One finds it difficult to argue with the very rational and valid points Ron Paul makes here. His historical perspective is accurate as is his view that had succession remained a viable consideration in 1860 the federal government likely would be much more restrained with significantly more power vested in the states and the people.

Perhaps he is right. At the point in time the Obama Administration usurps enough liberty from the people, and bankrupts the nation, it may again find itself on the American table of discourse.


Comments

Top Posts

Our Biggest Creditor {China} Tells Us "The good old days of borrowing are over"

The "Scandal" That Won't Go Away...

As the Liberal/Progressive Media and Blogosphere Attempt To Destroy Governor Chris Christie...

It's Going To Be Close, Brace Yourself For Continued Polarization of America, Especially if Obama Loses...

Spoken Like a True Dyed In the Blue Statist...

Race Baiting at the Highest Level of the Federal Government...?

The ObamaCare Divide Creating Two America's...

The Ignorance and Arrogance of Obama...

Obama the Socialist, or Is He? Listen to the Voice of One Who Knows...