Thoughts for Today

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty -vs- Tyranny


Conservatives, usually the ones who least understand the ethical and moral principles of capitalism, proudly claim Ayn Rand as their heroine. Precisely because Ayn Rand was perhaps the world's strongest advocate for a true capitalistic society.

Lets see what Rand had to say about the conservative movement...

Today’s “conservatives” are futile, impotent and, culturally, dead. They have nothing to offer and can achieve nothing. They can only help to destroy intellectual standards, to disintegrate thought, to discredit capitalism, and to accelerate this country’s uncontested collapse into despair and dictatorship.

“Conservatism: An Obituary,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 199

It was the so-called “conservatives” . . . who ran to the government for regulations and controls [over the broadcasting industry], and who cheered the notion of “public property” and service to the “public interest.”

“The Property Status of the Airwaves,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 126

Capitalism is not the system of the past; it is the system of the future—if mankind is to have a future. Those who wish to fight for it, must discard the title of “conservatives.” “Conservatism” has always been a misleading name, inappropriate to America. Today, there is nothing left to “conserve”: the established political philosophy, the intellectual orthodoxy, and the status quo are collectivism. Those who reject all the basic premises of collectivism are radicals in the proper sense of the word: “radical” means “fundamental.” Today, the fighters for capitalism have to be, not bankrupt “conservatives,” but new radicals, new intellectuals and, above all, new, dedicated moralists.

“Conservatism: An Obituary,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 201

There are three interrelated arguments used by today’s “conservatives” to justify capitalism, which can best be designated as: the argument from faith—the argument from tradition—the argument from depravity.

Sensing their need of a moral base, many “conservatives” decided to choose religion as their moral justification; they claim that America and capitalism are based on faith in God. Politically, such a claim contradicts the fundamental principles of the United States: in America, religion is a private matter which cannot and must not be brought into political issues.

Intellectually, to rest one’s case on faith means to concede that reason is on the side of one’s enemies—that one has no rational arguments to offer. The “conservatives’” claim that their case rests on faith, means that there are no rational arguments to support the American system, no rational justification for freedom, justice, property, individual rights, that these rest on a mystic revelation and can be accepted only on faith—that in reason and logic the enemy is right, but men must hold faith as superior to reason...


Now consider the second argument: the attempt to justify capitalism on the ground of tradition. Certain groups are trying to switch the word “conservative” into the exact opposite of its modern American usage, to switch it back to its nineteenth-century meaning, and to put this over on the public. These groups declare that to be a “conservative” means to uphold the status quo, the given, the established, regardless of what it might be, regardless of whether it is good or bad, right or wrong, defensible or indefensible. They declare that we must defend the American political system not because it is right, but because our ancestors chose it, not because it is good, but because it is old...

This leads us to the third—and the worst—argument, used by some “conservatives”: the attempt to defend capitalism on the ground of man’s depravity.

This argument runs as follows: since men are weak, fallible, non-omniscient and innately depraved, no man may be entrusted with the responsibility of being a dictator and of ruling everybody else; therefore, a free society is the proper way of life for imperfect creatures. Please grasp fully the implications of this argument: since men are depraved, they are not good enough for a dictatorship; freedom is all that they deserve; if they were perfect, they would be worthy of a totalitarian state.

Dictatorship—this theory asserts—believe it or not, is the result of faith in man and in man’s goodness; if people believed that man is depraved by nature, they would not entrust a dictator with power. This means that a belief in human depravity protects human freedom—that it is wrong to enslave the depraved, but would be right to enslave the virtuous. And more: dictatorships—this theory declares—and all the other disasters of the modern world are man’s punishment for the sin of relying on his intellect and of attempting to improve his life on earth by seeking to devise a perfect political system and to establish a rational society. This means that humility, passivity, lethargic resignation and a belief in Original Sin are the bulwarks of capitalism. One could not go farther than this in historical, political, and psychological ignorance or subversion. This is truly the voice of the Dark Ages rising again—in the midst of our industrial civilization...

“Conservatism: An Obituary,”
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 196

It would be well for those who fancy themselves as conservatives, and advocates of capitalism to consider the above. Capitalism, if it is to survive the 21'st century is going to need individuals with vision, intellect, logic, the ability to reason, and a willingness to discard the old where the old no longer works. Such individuals will be the advocates for, and the defenders of capitalism if it going to survive this century into the next,

Republicans (conservative statists) who claim to understand capitalism, and Ayn Rand would do well to revisit (or actually read) her philosophical writings.

Comments

  1. Yeah, I posted about this yesterday from the other side. There's not as much overlap as people think between conservatism and libertarianism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This argument runs as follows: since men are weak, fallible, non-omniscient and innately depraved, no man may be entrusted with the responsibility of being a dictator and of ruling everybody else; therefore, a free society is the proper way of life for imperfect creatures.

    Please grasp fully the implications of this argument: since men are depraved, they are not good enough for a dictatorship; freedom is all that they deserve; if they were perfect, they would be worthy of a totalitarian state.


    That's a non-sequitur. The second statement does not logically follow from the first. It's not that "man is not good enough for a dictatorship," but rather no man is good enough to be a dictator. It's an argument for freedom.

    The founders said as much, indeed that was the premise our republic and its system of government was founded upon.

    Also, I do not understand why she mixes capitalism (an economic system) with systems of government. A democratic society could be very anti-capitalist, and a dictatorship could be very capitalist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By it's very nature capitalism is driven by freedom and liberty. It is something apparently missed by many.

      Delete
  3. If capitalism is to survive (and I'm obviously hoping that it does), we have to somehow get rid of the revolving door aspect of lobbyists and politicians. President Obama said that he was a new politician and, yet, he's as close to big business as any of the others (yes, even including Bush and Clinton) have been. Combine that with the moronic behavior of the FED and it really doesn't look all that promising, now does it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed Will. For capitalism to survive we must exterminate the pull peddlers from the equation, eliminating lobbyists forever.

      I'm not holding my breathe.

      Delete

Post a Comment

RN USA is a No Judgement Zone (to steal from Planet Fitness), so please, No Judgement of others. We reserve the right to delete any such comment immediately upon detection.

All views are welcome. As long as the comment is on topic and respectful of others.



Top Posts

As the Obama Administration and a Compliant Lame Stream Media Continue the Benghazi Spin...

It's Going To Be Close, Brace Yourself For Continued Polarization of America, Especially if Obama Loses...

Another Republican Accused Of Sexual Misconduct...

The "Scandal" That Won't Go Away...

Illinois Democrats Move To Tighten Firearm Regulation/Restrictions...

The Public's Trust In Government on the Decline...

Our Biggest Creditor {China} Tells Us "The good old days of borrowing are over"

Nancy Pelosi Showing Again She Has Little if Any Grasp of Reality...