The Maddow Shuffle
By: WILL "TAKE NO PRISONERS" HART
Here, folks, is another example of what I consider rank dishonesty coming from Maddow. On her first day of covering that special NY 26th race, she made a humongous deal about how the Democratic candidate was 5 points ahead of the Republican candidate in what has historically been a Republican district (she also credited the Republican's support of the Ryan plan for the situation). "Hm, that's interesting", I'm thinking............................................................................................................Of course, it wasn't until 2 hours later that I learned that there was also a 3rd party candidate in that race - A TEA PARTY CANDIDATE!!!! - a tea party candidate who has no doubt been sucking votes away from the Republican. Granted, she has since acknowledged the existence of this candidate, but 24 hours after she initiated the story!.....Add to that the fact that she STILL hasn't acknowledged that the Democratic candidate in this race is infinitely more MY type of Democrat than it it is hers (a major league blue-dog, in other words) and, yeah, you really DO have to question this woman's honesty/integrity............................................................................................................Bottom-line, folks, it isn't just the Hannitys and Limbaughs on the planet who are pulling this "sticking firm to the narrative" bull-crap. The progressives - they be holding their own toasties, large!!
Here, folks, is another example of what I consider rank dishonesty coming from Maddow. On her first day of covering that special NY 26th race, she made a humongous deal about how the Democratic candidate was 5 points ahead of the Republican candidate in what has historically been a Republican district (she also credited the Republican's support of the Ryan plan for the situation). "Hm, that's interesting", I'm thinking............................................................................................................Of course, it wasn't until 2 hours later that I learned that there was also a 3rd party candidate in that race - A TEA PARTY CANDIDATE!!!! - a tea party candidate who has no doubt been sucking votes away from the Republican. Granted, she has since acknowledged the existence of this candidate, but 24 hours after she initiated the story!.....Add to that the fact that she STILL hasn't acknowledged that the Democratic candidate in this race is infinitely more MY type of Democrat than it it is hers (a major league blue-dog, in other words) and, yeah, you really DO have to question this woman's honesty/integrity............................................................................................................Bottom-line, folks, it isn't just the Hannitys and Limbaughs on the planet who are pulling this "sticking firm to the narrative" bull-crap. The progressives - they be holding their own toasties, large!!
I don't know what a "toastie" is Will, but if a deluded tea bagger wants to deliver an election to a Democrat I see that as a good thing.
ReplyDeleteRoss Perot delivered the election to Clinton in 1992. Some say Ralph Nader gave it to Bush in 2000. Sometimes it's good. Sometimes it's not.
Is a "toastie" a marshmallow on a cracker?
ReplyDelete