Tuesday, November 17, 2009

New Guidelines for Breat Cancer Screening Just Released.


For years the medical profession, in its effort to fight and reduce breast cancer deaths in women, has encouraged regular self examination and regular  mammograms beginning at age forty. This may all change if a panel commissioned by The Department of Health and Human Services has its way.


The new recommendations, while not applicable to women in high risk groups, suggest the following; 1) mammograms beginning at age 50, 2) mammograms administered every two years rather than yearly, 3) that physicians stop teaching women to examine their breast regularly. The justification offered is to "reduce harm from over treatment."


The new guidelines are currently available for review at The Annals of Internal Medicine. It is likely the new guidelines will set off  heated controversy. Especially so as they run contrary to some professional and advocacy groups position.


The National Cancer Institute is taking the initial position of re-evaluating its guidelines given the tasks force new report.


The American Cancer Society, as well as the American College of Radiology, are sticking with their guidelines and will continue to recommend mammograms beginning at age forty and be administered annually thereafter.


While the new recommended guidelines will likely have no immediate impact on insurance policies, it is likely they will result in less aggressively  prompting women in their forties to get mammograms and women in their fifties to have one annually.


In formulating its guidelines the task force used new studies in mammography from nine other than England and Sweden to arrive at their recommendations. Six statistical groups were utilized to analyze the data and set up models showing the relative impact of annual screening, and what the benefits are of annual screening.


The last time the task force made recommendations and issues guidelines was in 2002. The report recommended that women in their forties be screened for breast cancer annully. At the time Tommy Thompson, then Secretary of Health and Human Services, announced the report there were allegations of political influence, and that the report was politically motivated. Doctor Alfred Bird of the University of Washington, task force chairman, denied political motivation saying "there was absolutely zero political influence on what the task force did."


The shaded area, taken directly from the NYT article illustrates the cost savings to the nation through implementation of these new guidelines.  The task force concluded that one cancer death is prevented for every 1,904 women age 40 to 49 who are screened for 10 years, compared with one death for every 1,339 women age 50 to 74, and one death for every 377 women age 60 to 69. The ethical question to be asked, and answered, is whether the lives of those who survive breast cancer as the result of such screening is of enough value to offset the costs associated with mass early screening and detection.


The question is one that needs to be answered. For anyone to believe the timing of this is not at least partially influenced by political motivation  would be ludicrous. The drive for nationalized socialist cradle to grave health care is picking up a head of steam in the Obama dream years and will likely continue to do so. What we are witnessing with this is quite likely a preview of what we will come to see and know on a large scale, as the Federal Big Bother and Sister Government under Obama, and future Presidents must find ways to balance the federal budget.


Via: Memeorandum
Via: New York Times
Via: American Cancer Society
Via: National Cancer Institute

4 comments:

  1. Hi, we have had the same guidance from more enlightened health experts here in the UK.

    But Breast Cancer (all cancer) is big business for do-gooder false charities and health professionals who specialise themselves into oblivion in their pet-interest (specialism?).

    Over diagnosis/treatment is good for some people - just not the patients...

    ReplyDelete
  2. polaris - Thank you for visiting my site. And thanks also for your well stated points.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My pleasure, nice blog you have here. Will be back, regularly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you. Looking forward to your visits.

    ReplyDelete

As this site encourages free speech and expression any and all honest political commentary is acceptable. Comments with cursing or vulgar language will not be posted.

Effective 8/12/13 Anonymous commenting has been disabled. This unfortunate action was made necessary due to the volume of Anonymous comments that are either off topic or serve only to disrupt honest discourse..

I apologizes for any inconvenience this necessary action may cause the honest Anonymous who would comment here, respect proper decorum and leave comments of value. However, The multitude of trollish attack comments from both the left and right has necessitated this action.

Thank you for your understanding... The management.