Monday, October 22, 2012

Classic Blowhard, the "Donald" Trump...

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Liberty
-vs- Tyranny


Mr. Donald (the blowhard) Trump has announced he is going to release a "bombshell" that is "very very big" about President Obama. He has assured FOX News that they will be covering it in "a very big fashion." He anticipates it will be released Wednesday. Presumably (IMNHO) to allow time for spin activity following tonight's debate.

Right... Like the pompous blowhard that he is it is really all about the buildup of negative imagery and creating the perception of dastardly and apocalyptic consequences should America reelect President Obama. Perhaps it is so that if Obama is reelected it may very well be a net negative for the country (I believe it is). However, the truth is the country will still be here in another four years. We will undoubtedly have many more opportunities to alter direction and correct bad situations come 2016. Just as we always have. Just as the founders intended.

So, get serious dude. People of intelligence will judge Obama on his performance in office. Ascertaining how his decisions have affected them PERSONALLY as well as how they have affected the country will determine how informed individuals will vote. They really don't need, nor do they  want the likes of your pompous a*s feeding them a line of BS that simply put suits your own personal agenda.

Of course this is just my opinion and many will disagree. However, I'm betting a boatload more will find themselves if not in full agreement at least in partial agreement.

Politico - Donald Trump said on "Fox & Friends" Monday that he'll reveal “very big” news about President Barack Obama by Wednesday, but declined to give any hints about his plan.

“Something very, very big concerning the president of the United States,” he said. “It’s going to be very big. I know one thing — you will cover it in a very big fashion.”

Trump, who said he will announce the news on Twitter “sometime probably Wednesday,” suggested it could “possibly” impact the election. The businessman, who considered a run for the White House but endorsed former Gov. Mitt Romney, has long been a high-profile Obama birther conspiracy theorist.



 Watch the debate tonight. Think critically. Reflect on the last four years and how it has affected you and your family. At the end of the day and the process vote your conscience. I know I will be doing exactly that.

 Via: Memeorandum

26 comments:

  1. Just when you think that this fellow couldn't be more of a dufus, he pulls another one of these stunts. Unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The blowhard belongs in in a circus sideshow act.

      Delete
  2. Trump is one of yours, and Romney's best buddy.
    You are all scum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh lookie, Cowardly Anon-a-pus has returned dropping more droplets of his never ending bulls*it.

      News flash asshat, you are BELOW scum.

      Now, isn't it past time for your meds. Grab the Quaalude(s) and wash them down quickly with some rot gut whiskey.

      Toddles asshat.

      Delete
  3. All one needs to do to understand what a jerk The Donald is, is to look at the fool he made of himself when he declared his people, who he sent to Hawaii, were finding "amazing" things about President Obama's birth certificate.

    Absolutely nothing was reported by Trump on these "amazing" things because absolutely nothing was found. Trump is an opportunist liar and a preening jackass.

    And Willard welcomed his endorsement and support.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On point #1... Agreed.

      On point #2.... If you understand point #1 who cares?

      In conclusion... A vote for Romney (or Obama) is in my never humble opinion a vote for the Oligarchy, the puppet masters behind the curtains who pull the strings of the rEpublican and dEmocrat candidates.

      Voting Johnson, and so will you if you really are serious about change.

      Delete
  4. Not voting for your Rand hero Ryan? That's right Randian cult BS came in last, even behind that loserterian Johnson. You really know how to pick losers RN. You have had so much practice picking/supporting losers. Laughing at Dr. Mengela

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh look, another Pavlovian Doo Dropper. Thanks for stopping in, don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out.

      Pathetic little asshat.

      Delete
  5. It's so much fun proving the egotistical ass hole (you) who claims to always be right, be so fucking wrong. Retardly wrong. HA HA HA HA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks once again for proving yourself to be nothing more than a blog attack women for the Pavlovian pussycats that make of the delusional segment of the progressive movement.

      Delete
  6. I've got a big surprise for you the day after election day Dr. Mengela.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my! Ms. Canine Doo Dropper will have a surprise for me after the Election. A threat? Can't wait poppy pants.

      Now F..K OFF. Your kind really do belong in a maximum security mental hospital. Go take your Quaalude(s).

      Toddles Ms. Poppy Pants...

      As you have exposed yourself completely to be the ignorant asshat you are (as have your buddies from the Pavlovian pound) there wil be no further purpose to orint your delusional drivel. Game up. Go home to Mommy and back to you basement existence.

      Delete
  7. "People of intelligence will judge Obama on his performance in office."
    The problem is that, like raising kids, you don't have to take a class or prove you are competent to have kids or vote. The current administration has done an admirable job of buying votes by giving auto companies to the unions, increasing enrollment in food stamps and widening the free cell phone program. Of course the company giving the free phones is Carlos Slim, who is a Mexican billionaire and large Obama contributor.

    ReplyDelete

  8. skudrunner is at it again, spreading misinformation and lies all over the internet:

    "...increasing enrollment in food stamps and widening the free cell phone program."



    Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

    A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it. --FactCheck.org


    Also Snopes debunks the lie as well.


    Fact Check - He's referring to Carlos Slim who, according to Fox News, is "supplying cell phones to the poor." However, Trac Phone, which Slim has a 98.2% ownership of, has issued a "fact sheet" on behalf of its Safelink Wireless service which provides service for low income families as part of the Federal "Lifeline" Program which began in the Reagan administration and IS NOT DIRECTLY SUBSIDIZED BY TAXPAYER MONEYbut rather the Federal Universal Service Fund which paid for by telecommunications companies. They describe the Lifeline program which DOES NOT INCLUDE PHONES.

    He then tossed to the ever righteous and no longer virgin Steve Crowder who is not a political pundit but a so called comedian playing a pundit on TV. The chyron advanced th hoax: "Politics Going Mobile, Company Called Out For Free "Obama Phones." Crowder further advanced the hoax with claims that Mr. Slim is profiting off of these non-existant "free phones." The chyron reinforced the lie: "Can You Hear Me, Dem. Donor Supplying 'Obama Phones" to Poor."Crowder accused the president of preferential business practices which include "doling out free phones."


    skudrunner always says he doesn't watch FAUX NOOZ, then spreads its lies and deceit all over the internet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shaw, it is always good to see you stick up for this administration. I never stated that Obama started giving free cell phones, I stated that he increased enrollment in free cell phones and food stamps. I also never said the taxpayer paid for the free cell phones but to say it is funded by the telecom industry is a stretch of the truth. Although "NOT DIRECTLY SUBSIDIZED BY TAXPAYER MONEY" It is funded by a tax on all cell phone subscribers so it is only a tax on people who pay.

      It was a free cell phone recipient who stated she will vote for Obama because he gave he a free Obamaphone, not me and not the news services, whichever one you side with.

      As slimy reid would say, word is out Obama knew the embassy was being attacked and did nothing. After all he had a fund raiser to get to.

      Delete
  9. In the predictable event that skudrunner claims my sources are liberally biased, Forbes debunks his lie as well. Forbes is hardly liberal friendly.

    I can't count how many times skudrunner has dealt in lies and misinformation. This is just one more example of his dishonesty.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Obama's the only realistic choice this year if you live in a swing state. The smart voter there will consider balance of power. Les has the luxury of voting his conscience this election, because it will only aid that end. I used to have the luxury, to liberal ends, when I lived in NJ. But now I live in Florida, and so my vote is much more important when it comes to the balance of power in DC.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  11. When Trump is not in the spotlight he does something stupid to get back in. I don't think the man can be embarrassed no matter how outlandish his behavior is. Maybe all the hair jell has affected his mental capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As per Will's first comment: This "dufus" is crazy like a fox. He thrives on publicity, good or bad. And thanks to this post, there are 17... no 18 comments about it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Like the chosen one, Shaw always deflects what is written to her interpretation of what she believes. At least you are committed to twisting what is said. I never mentioned liberal media in my post only stated the truth about the anointed ones record.
    You are a good lemming and for that you are to be congratulated.

    Can you deny that during the Obama debacle food stamp participation has increased, that free cell cell phones are paid for by a tax on cell phone payers. The answer is NO so nothing what I said was untruthful.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah, Shaw, the skudrunner got this one wrong but based upon some of the stuff that you put out in the previous thread, I wouldn't be so quick to throw out disinformation charges. The fact of the matter is that intelligence sources knew in real time (CNN reported on the in-time emails tonight) that this was an attack by militants (they even took credit for it WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING!) and not some spontaneous action by a mob that didn't even exist. These attackers came replete with mortar, grenades, and a couple dozen AK-47s (NONE of which you normally see in a group of protesters, even in the Middle-East) and for the administration to continue to say some 6-8 days later that it was a spontaneous mob action is utterly laughable and it disappoints me greatly to see you spin so for the President here (nobody here's saying that you still can't vote for him, for Christ).

    ReplyDelete
  15. Will, if you were more accurate in your comments, you will see I didn't spin anything.

    When an attack such as the one that occured in Benghazi happens. I merely repeated what the CIA reported. If you have a problem with their report, take it up with them.

    I put more value on what they claimed than on what anti-Obama partisans say.


    skud: "The current administration has done an admirable job of buying votes by...widening the free cell phone program. Of course the company giving the free phones is Carlos Slim, who is a Mexican billionaire and large Obama contributor."


    You're wrong again. The Obama administration has nothing to do with the cell phone program.

    More partisan hackery on your part.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think we should lock The Donald and Gloria Allred in a room until after the election and, you know, see what happens...

    ReplyDelete

As this site encourages free speech and expression any and all honest political commentary is acceptable. Comments with cursing or vulgar language will not be posted.

Effective 8/12/13 Anonymous commenting has been disabled. This unfortunate action was made necessary due to the volume of Anonymous comments that are either off topic or serve only to disrupt honest discourse..

I apologizes for any inconvenience this necessary action may cause the honest Anonymous who would comment here, respect proper decorum and leave comments of value. However, The multitude of trollish attack comments from both the left and right has necessitated this action.

Thank you for your understanding... The management.