General David Petraeus - Progress in Afghanistan

by: Les Carpenter
Rational Nation USA
Birthplace of Independent Conservatism



According to General Petraeus things are looking up in Afghanistan. We have the Taliban operations either halted or reversed. This is good news.

When America went in to this rugged mountainous country to pursue, and bring the perpetrators of 911 to justice we did so with justification. After the initial successful incursion into Afghanistan GWB's administration shifted military focus to Iraq, a country that supposedly had weapons of mass destruction. We still don't have Osama Bin Laden, and we never found the WMD. However, what we did get was over ten tears of  engagement in Afghanistan, additional loss of life, and a larger national debt.

I digress. Back to the encouraging news from Afghanistan and Gen. Petraeus. With recent successes in the south that have set the Taliban back there may actually be a potential end this long and costly military engagement.

Experts from the NYT's.

KABUL, Afghanistan — Besides well-reported advances in southern provinces, American and NATO forces have also been able to halt or reverse Taliban gains around the capital, Kabul, and even in the north and west of the country, Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top American commander in Afghanistan, said Tuesday.


The general made his case for an improving overall picture in Afghanistan in an interview, offering a preview of what is likely to be his argument next week when he testifies before Congress for the first time since he took over command of coalition forces in Afghanistan eight months ago.


It will also be his first testimony since the influx of additional American and Afghan troops began to change the balance of the fighting in southern Afghanistan in late 2010.


Under General Petraeus, the tempo of operations has been stepped up enormously. American Special Operations forces and coalition commandos have mounted more than 1,600 missions in the 90 days before March 4 — an average of 18 a night — and the troops have captured and killed close to 3,000 insurgents, according to information provided by the general.


“The momentum of the Taliban has been halted in much of the country and reversed in some important areas,” he said.


“The Taliban have never been under the pressure that they were put under over the course of the last 8 to 10 months,” he added.


Other aspects of the war remain difficult, and progress is patchy and slow, General Petraeus conceded. There has been only modest momentum on efforts to persuade Taliban fighters to give up the fight and join a reintegration program, and a plan to train and install thousands of local police officers in rural communities to mobilize resistance to the Taliban has proved to be a painstaking business constrained by concerns that it will create militias loyal to warlords.


But security in and around Kabul has significantly improved, he said, thanks in part to specialized commando units of the Afghan Army, the police and the intelligence service, which operate in the greater Kabul area.


In 2009, Kabul was encircled by Taliban forces and there was talk of the capital’s falling to the insurgents, but now much of the greater Kabul area has been secured, he said.


President Hamid Karzai is to announce on the Afghan New Year, March 21, the beginning of the transition to Afghan control of some districts around the country, part of the plan to pass responsibility for security to the Afghan government by 2014.


The Taliban are expected to try to retake lost territory in coming months, and in particular to single out those districts in transition, the general said. But he said coalition forces would mount their own spring offensive to pre-empt Taliban efforts to retake lost territory.


“You cannot eliminate all the sensationalist attacks,” he said. “That is one of the objectives for our spring offensive — to solidify those gains and push them back further.”


Over the past four months, coalition forces have seen a fourfold increase in the number of weapons and explosives caches found and cleared, in large measure because the Taliban were forced out of territory they had held for up to five years, he said.
Truly good news. One can only hope the conclusion to this era in our history is indeed growing closer, that the troops will be home soon.

Here now the rest of the NYT article.

The one nagging question that keeps reoccurring is this. If, when we finally leave Afghanistan the Taliban should be resurgent how will the notational leadership handle it?

My other thought is,  with the growing unrest in the Middle East will we merely move from one theater of operation to the next? Only time will tell I guess. But it is evident that since the end of WW II the nation has found itself  engaged in one theater of operation or another.

I am reminded of President Dwight David Eisenhower and his warning  in 1961 of a growing Military Industrial Complex and its threat to national liberty.

Via: Memeorandum

Comments

  1. My main concern is how Afghanistan can develope a stable and functional central government. Karzai is a tragic joke, and without us, for the foreseeable future, he really is nothing more than the Crooked King of Kabul.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  2. Afghanistan seems to be so far behind modern society- more so than even Iran. That is why I think they are always at the mercy of the Taliban. The Taliban represents the centuries of cultural stagnation in Afghanistan. If they would open their minds, I believe they could truly throw out those terrorists and become a World Nation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Iran is a rather modern and developed state, Elm. They just have a reactionary theocracy for a government. It's a bad thing, and perhaps could be thought of as "backwards," but Iran is a very modern and developed state. Afghanistan is hundreds of years behind Iran.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  4. We've been tactically brilliant on the ground, but larger forces easily negate battlefield gains. Afghanistan is rotten and corrupt to the core. The bad guys have safe haven in Pakistan. Those two factors alone prevent any "victory."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with Silver. Any "victories" in Afghanistan are temporary. I don't know if I'd call the country itself "rotten and corrupt to the core" but it does have a very backwards and different culture, still tribal, nomadic, agrarian, and dangerously religious. Also as Silver pointed out, Pakistan offers safe haven for the worst of the worst Afghani religious radicals and I don;t see anyone saying we should cleanse Pakistan.

    Just the same, it would be wise to try to put a strong military central government in there before we split. It's the best-worst we can hope for.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete
  6. From where would a strong military central government be drawn? The tribalistic, backwards, and dangerously religious people of an extremely poor nation I presume.

    And who would support their efforts at putting such government in place. Afghanistan sure ain't Egypt and once a strong military central government is in power new and equally as troubling circumstances may arise. Indeed likely will arise.

    Perhaps the best bet ig to get out asap, and the the poppy growing farmers so their own thing. Perhaps in another millennium...

    Unless we just get out, I see no way out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A case could be made to arm up the north and western parts, essentially splitting the country. They would get help from their Uzbek and Tajik brothers to the north, and Pakistan would end up with a big Pashtun belt mess on their hands.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm always up for some good news, RN. But whenever you combine "whack a mole" with Beau Geste, the results tend not to be lasting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Les,

    The best I can see is a strong paid-off military. It doesn't matter what they think, so long as they like money. It sucks, but that seems to me to be the way that is.

    JMJ

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

RN USA is a No Judgement Zone (to steal from Planet Fitness), so please, No Judgement of others. We reserve the right to delete any such comment immediately upon detection.

All views are welcome. As long as the comment is on topic and respectful of others.



Top Posts

The Ignorance and Arrogance of Obama...

Spoken Like a True Dyed In the Blue Statist...

The "Scandal" That Won't Go Away...

It's Going To Be Close, Brace Yourself For Continued Polarization of America, Especially if Obama Loses...

2015 Could Be a Bad Year for Liberals...

Small Businesses Can Improve the Health of a Community...

Is Our Democratic Republic At Risk From Forces Both Foreign and Within?...

April Job Numbers Appear Improved... Are They Really?

Jon Stewart and the Babbling Nancy Pelosi...